გახსენით მობილურ აპლიკაციაში
Why does it seem so difficult to look towards the future? It is always just a breath away, hence not as intangible as it might seem at first, when positioned at distance.
What are the odds that one's hypothesis is refuted? Does this go by chance, like in the ratio of 50-50, or are there some other formulae which are taking diverse variables into account?
Some things can't be just framed in words. I think, it needs drawings, or else, for those blanks to be voiced, to be able to say, like Michael Taussig says that 'I Swear I Saw This' so this'.
One of the few places on earth where words had a meaning. Where philosophy had a price.
Notice the distinction between future, past, and present. Keeps the whole life of the being in the present. […] It is all in the present.
And even with the help of others, or even when narrowing down the text from one lecture to just one single paragraph, we won't just tend to infinity but start looping
But where to write? And how to write?
I like the mess that the parallel back and forth creates but I am wondering if that can only hold true for sketches, for creating a base for a text then to be written.
How to think and/or imagine a world, which is devoid of humans altogether. How to think this unthinkable within the probable impossibility to think the without human using human thought?
The question of consciousness is an interesting one when thinking about artificial intelligence (AI)
As a child I loved painting by numbers. I remember the process as a time of both deep concentration and satisfaction, adding up the 12s and 41s, and whichever numbers called for a specific color.
No results found, try again
Incorrect e-mail or password
გთხოვთ ჩაწეროთ დადასტურების კოდი, რომელიც გამოიგზავნა თქვენს ელ-პოსტის მისამართზე :
Sorry something went wrong
Code sent succesfully. please check "spam" folder