გახსენით მობილურ აპლიკაციაში
I like the mess that the parallel back and forth creates but I am wondering if that can only hold true for sketches, for creating a base for a text then to be written.
How to think and/or imagine a world, which is devoid of humans altogether. How to think this unthinkable within the probable impossibility to think the without human using human thought?
The question of consciousness is an interesting one when thinking about artificial intelligence (AI)
As a child I loved painting by numbers. I remember the process as a time of both deep concentration and satisfaction, adding up the 12s and 41s, and whichever numbers called for a specific color.
I think the important thing is to move from inhuman to posthuman so that humans can stop becoming posthuman and delegate to inhuman.
'Words are ambiguous and meaningful. And thereby chosen.' That's how I had decided to end Essay Four on Multilingualism [1]_Metatext.
why would someone, who tried to avoid terminology, which often needs knowledge of centuries' old connotations and shifts of a term, speak outside a monolingual 'simplicity'?
I keep reminding myself that this is not an academic endeavor. And I keep asking myself, how to start this proposed process of thinking, this proposed life task?
So, why Proust? Because Mamardashvili points out that something fundamental happens to us...
When creating art, there are those moments when things fall into place. When concept and form merge or overlap, and a specific certainty sets in, because one knows that now, things are right.
Total: Result
No results found, try again
Incorrect e-mail or password
გთხოვთ ჩაწეროთ დადასტურების კოდი, რომელიც გამოიგზავნა თქვენს ელ-პოსტის მისამართზე :
Sorry something went wrong
Code sent succesfully. please check "spam" folder
Items left:
